Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/65641
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | David R. Howell | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Vipul Lugade | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mikhail Taksir | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | William P. Meehan | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-05T04:38:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-05T04:38:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-01-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 23263660 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 00913847 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85068172181 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1080/00913847.2019.1632155 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85068172181&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/65641 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Objectives: Our was objectives were to (1) assess the validity of a smartphone-based application to obtain spatiotemporal gait variables relative to an established movement monitoring system used previously to evaluate post-concussion gait, and (2) determine the test-retest reliability of gait variables obtained with a smartphone. Methods: Twenty healthy participants (n = 14 females, mean age = 22.2, SD = 2.1 years) were assessed at two time points, approximately two weeks apart. Two measurement systems (inertial sensor system, smartphone application) acquired and analyzed single-task and dual-task spatio-temporal gait variables simultaneously. Our primary outcome measures were average walking speed (m/s), cadence (steps/min), and stride length (m) measured by the inertial sensor system and smartphone application. Results: Correlations between the systems were high to very high (Pearson r = 0.77–0.98) at both time points, with the exception of dual-task stride length at time 2 (Pearson r = 0.55). Bland-Altman analysis for average gait speed and cadence indicated the average disagreement between systems was close to zero, suggesting little evidence for systematic bias between acquisition systems. Test-retest consistency measures using the smartphone revealed high to very high reliability for all measurements (ICC = 0.81–0.95). Conclusions: Our results indicate that sensors within a smartphone are capable of measuring spatio-temporal gait variables similar to a validated three-sensor inertial sensor system in single-task and dual-task conditions, and that data are reliable across a two-week time interval. A smartphone-based application might allow clinicians to objectively evaluate gait in the management of concussion with high ease-of-use and a relatively low financial burden. | en_US |
dc.subject | Health Professions | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.title | Determining the utility of a smartphone-based gait evaluation for possible use in concussion management | en_US |
dc.type | Journal | en_US |
article.title.sourcetitle | Physician and Sportsmedicine | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Children's Hospital Boston | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | University of Colorado School of Medicine | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Harvard Medical School | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Chiang Mai University | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Control One LLC | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Micheli Center for Sports Injury Prevention | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Childrens Hospital | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | CMUL: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.